Search for: "State v. Judge" Results 561 - 580 of 80,872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
  That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 2:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Kimble, Joseph, The Value of Intuition in Judging: A Case Study (February 23, 2021). 57 Court Review 34 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3850952 “The article reports on a survey of readers about the reasoning in United States v. [read post]
They claimed that after Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, the groups stopped aiding Texan women to leave the state to get abortions—because of the fear of prosecution under the states abortion ban. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
Filed March 21, 2007--Order by Judge Irma S. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:35 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In her Decision and Order in People of State of New York v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:45 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post State Redistricting Under Gaffney v Cummings appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Vin Bonventre
 If there is a Creator, He got it right with Judge Cardona. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:38 pm by Dwight Sullivan
As reported by the LA Times here, LtCol David Jones, the military judge in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
In a split decision written by Judge Larry Jones, Sr., in which Judge Melody Stewart concurred in judgment only, and wrote separately, and Judge Frank Celebrezze dissented, the appeals court found that R.C. 2907.03(A)(13) violated the Equal Protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions, and was unconstitutional on its face. [read post]