Search for: "State v. L. M." Results 561 - 580 of 5,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
Burke, I’m hoping that you will be in a different situation, not on a phone. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:04 am by Mack Sperling
Sept. 15, 2015) (applying North Carolina conflict of laws rules and following the approach taken in Domtar); Chattery Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 3:28 am
Salzburg, Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
” The housing ‘medical advisor’ then did a ‘report’ (though containing little by way of medical assessment) which stated: “I’m surprised to see [the 5 June 2017] letter requesting rehousing, which seems somewhat at odds with her (sic) own full C&F report of 5 Jun 2017 in which she (sic) states: ‘the actual property seems appropriate as per Housing team’s description’. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
 Not a fan of them, to be sure, but if they're done well, I'm okay with it. [read post]