Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am
As such, PRS and QA both have a close and genuine link to their home state. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4] The federal government had its own DOMA.[5] But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a celebration… [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The ICO has published a comment on the House of Lords Committee on Democracy and Digital Technology report “Digital Technology and the Resurrection of Trust“. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
That much is clear from the judgment of Lord Jus [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
On the same day Steyn J heard various applications in the case of Ameyaw v Goldrick. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
The consolidated body was chaired by Lord Kitchin (as he now is). [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
They are either the physical or abstract manifestations, signs, animated by the meaning breathed into it the way that "the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:40 am
Maintenance obligations are covered by their own inter-state jurisdiction regime set out in the Maintenance Regulation. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
On the ball as always, Joost told me that the appeal in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am
Trecarrell House Limited v Rouncefield (2020) EWCA Civ 760 It is fair to say this Court of Appeal decision has been widely and keenly awaited. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
Johnson and U.S. v. [read post]
