Search for: "State v. Mai X."
Results 561 - 580
of 3,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Justice Lee stated that the evidence may change the outcome of the case and extends beyond Lehrmann’s credibility. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Congress promises a state $X of funding to be used for highway construction for each of the next three years. [read post]
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Determining Nexus Between Claims and Secondary Considerations
19 Dec 2019, 10:00 pm
In Fox Factory, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
Abbott, holding that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
In AG v X [1992] 1 IR 1, 79, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) McCarthy J said (at [138]): If there be a hierarchy of constitutional rights, as argued by the Attorney General, it is, perhaps easier to compare two of them rather than to identify the level of each particular right. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Hellerstedt, a state may not impose an undue burden on a woman seeking an abortion. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
x. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am
App’x 814, 816-17 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
In this case, X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)), the claimant demanded the recognition by the UK authorities of her child’s adoption in Nigeria. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
The European Commission of Human Rights has already recognised this as art 8 is seen to comprise “the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings” (X v Iceland (1976) 5 DR 86). [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:01 am
Thomas 19-1201Issue: Whether a sign regulation containing an exception for on-premises signs, for which both commercial and noncommercial speech may qualify, violates the First Amendment under the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Reed v. [read post]
