Search for: "State v. McDonnell"
Results 561 - 580
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 5:53 am
In these cases, courts follow the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 8:13 am
In its 2015 decision in Burton v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:01 am
McDonnell Douglas works by having the jury scrutinize the validity of those claims. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
Graham v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent ruling, Durham v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:09 am
The lower court’s grant of summary judgment and a jury verdict in favor of his employer on his retaliation claims were affirmed, however (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut, July 14, 2014, Wesley, R). [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:19 am
In so doing, the court revived the Section 1981 and state law race discrimination claims of a fired shipping company broker, finding the evidence sufficient to dispute the company’s assertion that it fired the broker for falsifying records (Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
The employee sued Nationwide for sex and pregnancy discrimination under Title VII and state law. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
The only question, therefore, was whether the employee was able to meet the shifting burdens of McDonnell Douglas. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 11:36 am
A recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, however, France v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:06 am
Likewise, the appeals court affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment with regard to the employee’s defamation claim (Tolbert v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 5:21 pm
Conversely, Article IX of the Fundamental Law stated: “1. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:42 pm
The employee’s negligent hiring, retention, and supervision claims failed (Shackelford v Publix Super Markets, Inc, October 14, 2014, Haikala, M). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Summary judgment for the employer was reversed on the contract claim (Balding v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:50 am
A jury would also decide if the lead employee’s comment and “constant” racial slurs created a hostile work environment (Gilliam v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]