Search for: "State v. Miles"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
In the Raulerson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
In the Raulerson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of KansasOpinion Date: 9/17/09Cite: Oldham Graphic Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
A.M. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
Code,1 §§ 503, 508) following a jury trial and sentenced to state prison. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:26 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:09 pm
The incident occurred in vicinity of The Twins, roughly ½ mile off the mouth of the Indian River in Sitka. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:22 am
Emerson Electric Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
(Andrade v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The stage appears to be set for intervention by the United States Supreme Court following the Ninth Circuit’s recent panel decision in Batterton v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:20 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:53 am
The Court found that the wells distance from the plant - from five hundred feet to eight miles- meant the source were not "adjacent' for purposes of treating them as a single source under Title V. [read post]
