Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 561 - 580 of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am by Will Baude
On a quick reflection, it seems likely to me that this language was understood to give power to the legislatures of the states, acting pursuant to their (state) constitutional procedures. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:23 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock Copyright * Comments on Blurrred Lines jury verdict. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Many readers of this blog may be members of the settlement class in the BAR/BRI antitrust case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States on a good-faith exception to exclusion for a change in case law, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd on qualified immunity from civil suit. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court, taking quick action on two states’ constitutional challenge to Colorado’s new marijuana sales policy, asked the federal government on Monday for its reaction to that case (144 Original, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by christopher
For those who would like to read a seminal internet judicial decision upholding a defense of Fair Use, I suggest Kelly v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock Trademarks and Domain Names * TheDomains: .Sucks Releases Pricing With “Premiums” For Trademark Holders Up To $2,499 A Year. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:31 am
In the meantime, here are two quick items from earlier today. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
State Regulation of the Internet * Some state legislators are becoming privacy entrepreneurs about behavioral targeting. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Zachary Fasman
On Monday, June 21, the Supreme Court in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]