Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:13 am
I’ve retired my old Quick Links format, so instead I’m rounding up a couple of Facebook cases that hit my alerts. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
State laws State-by-state surrogacy laws (as of Fall, 2009) Ohio Laws Uniform Parentage Act (Ohio): R.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 4:11 am
Here's the abstract:In Panetti v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
Section V: Retention An IC element may retain raw SIGINT for up to five years “after the information is first collected by NSA,” unless continued retention (for up to another five years) is approved in writing by the IC head. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
A very quick review of several state LLC acts reveals that different states have different (or no) formulations for derivative claims. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:08 am
Readers might remember the case of LB Harrow v Ibrahim and another [2008] EWCA Civ 386 (noted by us here) where the Court of Appeal referred three questions to the ECJ concerning the rights of residents of family members of former Community workers. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:52 am
David Quick is a patent attorney with Ice Miller LLP focusing his efforts on patent prosecution and general intellectual property matters.Verizon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Many readers of this blog may be members of the settlement class in the BAR/BRI antitrust case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 9:16 am
(OhioLINK print book) Roberto Lavalle V. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court, taking quick action on two states’ constitutional challenge to Colorado’s new marijuana sales policy, asked the federal government on Monday for its reaction to that case (144 Original, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:46 am
Supreme Court said a few years ago in Clark County Schools v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
On a quick reflection, it seems likely to me that this language was understood to give power to the legislatures of the states, acting pursuant to their (state) constitutional procedures. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:07 pm
See Ryder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:06 am
The case is styled, Maria Abdon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Ars Technica: Hollywood v. [read post]
