Search for: "State v. Rider"
Results 561 - 580
of 797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 3:11 pm
This is because a bicycle is not considered a vehicle, as was established nearly twenty years ago in People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:08 pm
This past week, LinkedIn filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit’s blockbuster ruling in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
In Friends of the Everglades v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:30 am
The case, Gadd v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm
” Ohio v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
The plaintiff alleged that Uber CEO and co-founder Travis Kalanick conspired with Uber drivers to use a pricing algorithm to set the prices charged to riders, thereby restricting price competition among drivers to the detriment of riders. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
It also attached what the Sioux call the “sell or starve” rider (19 Stat. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:06 am
This law, which has been applied in various other states, was addressed in a landmark case in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts entitled Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
That is the key issue in the new case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
The plaintiff’s state law claims also failed (Goldberg v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:04 pm
In Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 2:43 pm
(hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm
Bradwell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
Lamensdorf v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
The case, Aslam v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:05 pm
The department received 75 applications and selected 40 (including the sergeant), to participate in horse and rider evaluations. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
