Search for: "State v. Shannon" Results 561 - 580 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Shannon , No. 07-3554 In a suit by a railroad seeking a declaratory judgment that state overtime provisions were preempted by federal law, summary judgment for plaintiff and determination that federal law preempted the state statute are affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's claim that the state labor agency's investigation and enforcement of state overtime law was preempted by the federal Railway Labor Act was not ripe for consideration; and 2) field… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:15 pm
Dates for reimbursement under the LPTV Digital-to-Analog grant program revisited - Washington, D.C. attorney Brendan Holland of Davis Wright Tremaine in the firm's Broadcast Law Blog Pension fund governance in the Lonestar State - Financial risk manager Susan Mangiero of Pension Governance LLC at her blog, Pension Risk Matters Delaware's Judge Kevin Gross rules that, absent adequate protection, Whitehall's asset sale may not include consigned jewels - Chicago lawyer… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
" The decision didn't surprise many, said Shannon Edmonds, staff attorney for government relations with the Texas District and County Attorneys Association. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:51 pm
Sophia Vorovong of the Lafayette Journal Courier reports today on the Court of Appeals decision yesterday in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]