Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 561 - 580
of 800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
John adds that Mr Brandis has stated that the new Government will wait until the post-implementation review of the ARR scheme is complete before it does anything. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In that regard reliance may be placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court rendered in the case of State of Punjab v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:58 pm
"The Court added that the fact that the litigation is mainly fought in India in respect of a temporary injunction is a very unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 12:14 am
The attempt to justify the constitutionality of Section 124-A by relying on the judgement made in Kedar Nath Singh v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:59 pm
V. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm
The most notorious example has been McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd, an unfair dismissal claim brought by a relationship counselor who as a result of his Christian beliefs refused to promote gay sex. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:15 pm
The article is coauthored with Joseph Greenlee and Bhav Ninder Singh. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
In the 1969 Presidential election when Indira Gandhi gave the call for conscience vote, resulting in the election of V.V.Giri, the Supreme Court held in Shiv Kripal Singh v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
In Narpat Singh Vs. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
The court stated that Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am
Singh Estate v Bajrangie-Singh (1999), 129 ETR (2d) 302, 1999 CarswellOnt 2230 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
Singh Estate v Bajrangie-Singh (1999), 129 ETR (2d) 302, 1999 CarswellOnt 2230 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
On Friday 4 November 2011, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) dismissed the application for permission in the judicial review case of R (Decoulos) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
That last case, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Wadhwa v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
India: Congress MP, Avtar Singh Bhadana, has filed a defamation case in the Delhi High Court accusing Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal of tarnishing his reputation by branding him as corrupt. [read post]
