Search for: "State v. Square" Results 561 - 580 of 6,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
For example, the Fifth Circuit in Stokes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm by Mukund Rathi
They are also expanding both qualified immunity, which often protects both state and federal officials from paying damages, as well as flawed doctrine from Monell v. [read post]
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a petition with the Supreme Court seeking a reversal of the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald Mann
ShareIt is fair to expect Wednesday’s arguments in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]