Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 561 - 580 of 4,256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
Padilla II that the California Equal Protection Clause rendered unconstitutional a law requiring California publicly listed corporations to have board members from “underrepresented communities. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
Padilla II that the California Equal Protection Clause rendered unconstitutional a law requiring California publicly listed corporations to have board members from “underrepresented communities. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm by Holly Brezee
NQSOs with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock (as of the date of the grant) are not taxable income to the holder until exercised. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Padilla, in which the Los Angeles County Superior Court held that California’s statute requiring women on corporate boards violates the state constitution’s equal protection clause. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
That view cannot, so it seems to me, survive the opening words of FPR 27.11, which expressly state that the right granted to journalists is to attend a hearing held in private. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:00 am by Ezra Rosser
Board of Education in 1954, education litigation has slowly progressed under State constitutions towards recognizing an affirmative duty for States to provide a free and equal education. [read post]
29 May 2022, 5:04 am by jonathanturley
The Supreme Court has a pending Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
And so they have everything to gain by unlocking this system that has suppressed all athletes and effectively in terms of equal opportunity has treated them all badly. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am by Nicholas Espíritu
Board of Education, held that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits racial segregation in public schools. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
Padilla, Case No. 19STCV27561, that California’s statute requiring California-based public companies to have one to three women on their boards of directors (S.B. 826), depending on their board size, violated the equal protection clause of the state constitution. [read post]