Search for: "State v. Utter"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2014, 7:48 pm
Foster v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:27 am
WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Words Uttered by Defendant Not for Legitimate Purpose; Dismissal of Harassment Charges Denied People v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am
The suggestion of perjury is utter nonsense. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
From State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
The employee in Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:35 am
, State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the same 3rd… [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
People of the State of New York U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Bush's utter unfitness to be President of the United States) by dooming a widely-accepted reform? [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:08 am
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006). [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:43 am
The Appellate Division explained that "A privileged communication is one which, but for the occasion on which it is uttered, would be defamatory and actionable," citing Park Knoll Assoc. v Schmidt, 59 NY2d 205. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
Bond v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 10:30 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
Quinn and Friedrichs v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 am
" What utter nonsense. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:20 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the case of FCC v. [read post]
