Search for: "State v. Vigil"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The country’s law enforcement and intelligence community has been vigilant since the beginning of this month, when 22 people were killed in a terrorist attack on a Dhaka restaurant in an attack claimed by ISIS. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:39 pm
Grimm v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:39 pm
Grimm v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 9:42 am
Earlier this year, in the case of Hineman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 12:58 pm
In Sorenson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 9:37 am
In Wally G. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In HB 1523 § 3(8)(a), the State is permitting the differential treatment to be carried out by individual clerks. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Beacon v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
The criminal case is titled: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:40 am
His cycling friends kept vigil by his side. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:40 am
His cycling friends kept vigil by his side. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:00 am
Cardozo wrote that "the orbit of the danger as disclosed to the eye of reasonable vigilance would be the orbit of the duty. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:59 am
Expert commentary on the decision is also included below (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:30 pm
The 2009 Supreme Court decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3] Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Bernard v. [read post]
