Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2020, 4:01 pm
Or will it be the Florida Kleiman v Wright lawsuit? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 3:45 am
Furthermore, in Durham Holdings Pty Ltd v New South Wales (2000) 205 CLR 399, the High Court held there was no "deeply rooted right" to receive compensation for property acquired under State legislation. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The fight between Nestlé and Cadbury has already led to a judgment by the ECJ (yes), the High Court of England and Wales, the Singapore Court of Appeal and now (well, kind of now) the General Court (T-112/13). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in McDougall v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
TTM (By his Litigation Friend TM) v London Borough of Hackney, East London NHS Foundation Trust; Secretary of State for Health – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has ruled that the local authority, but not the detaining hospital, was liable to pay compensation to a person who had been unlawfully detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am
It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
As Mr Justice Birss stated:"27. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am
The ICO’s investigation was triggered by the recent UK High Court decision in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales (see our previous blog post here), where the court held that the use of facial recognition technology by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was lawful. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:45 am
", proclaimed copyright consultant and 1709 Blogger Hugo Cox in his appraisal of the present state of copyright protection and enforcement. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:15 am
(a Taiwan Corp.) and HTC America (its US subsidiary based in Washington State) are accused of infringement. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Although not an English the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision of Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA provides timely guidance in relation to a Court’s position on the obligations placed on conveyancing solicitors in relation to lending practices. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.Starting at 2 pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “When you do nothing or you can’t do anything – acquiescence and other modern challenges in trade mark… [read post]
