Search for: "State v. Wines" Results 561 - 580 of 1,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
The relevant public by reference to which the absolute ground for refusal must be assessed is the average consumer in the Member State in which the place designated by a GI is situated. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
It is also fairly easy to spot the respondents who have been coached since they know one and only one story from the Bible, which is inevitably short-handed as: “water to wine. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
McGraw and State Farm Insurance, PICS Case No. 13-2987 (Pa.Super. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
McGraw and State Farm Insurance, PICS Case No. 13-2987 (Pa.Super. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
  At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Or imagine the same as to a law requiring all markets to sell beer and wine, and owners of a Methodist or a Muslim family corporation object to this because they think selling wine is sinful. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
In re Royal Wine Corporation, Serial No. 85775626 (October 16, 2013) [not precedential]. . . . [read post]