Search for: "Stock v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 5,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 12:09 am
Facciponti works for the taxpayers of the United States of America. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
See Thomson v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:00 am
Olunga v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
Fund v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
Congress has had numerous opportunities to state its will. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:51 pm
The case, Tatum v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
The stock ownership case is Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Dabit, 547 U.S. 71, 83 (2006) and Proctor v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
In an attempt to escape the obvious conclusion that the common stock is a covered security, the plaintiffs argued that the stock must actually be traded to qualify, and cited Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:18 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
Eventually, the Court created a limited exception for corporations to be considered citizens of the states where they were incorporated; an exception Congress later codified and expanded to include the states where the principal place of business was located. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am
Advocates argue that Congress didn’t really end Indian reservation status for much of the state of Oklahoma even if everyone at the time thought it did [Will Baude on Sharp v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
The Transfer Restrictions In 2005, all of the 4C shareholders entered into a shareholders agreement containing stock transfer restrictions and put rights designed to maintain family ownership and control. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:34 am
Filed in the Eastern District of New York, the complaint seeks injunctive relief, including blocking an upcoming vote on compensation committee members, a corrected proxy statement, and the return of any wrongfully awarded cash and stock bonuses (Stein v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:18 am
How hot is this stock? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:41 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
