Search for: "Stores v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 13,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division noted that nothing in the regulation supported Petitioner's argument that agency was required to produce additional information regarding how the records were stored and retrieved in its database. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division noted that nothing in the regulation supported Petitioner's argument that agency was required to produce additional information regarding how the records were stored and retrieved in its database. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The Statute passed in New York State in August 2022 is part of a legislative package to “honor and support Holocaust survivors in educational, cultural, and financial institutions,” and to put forth paths to improve education about the Nazi period.[10] The Claims Conference: Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, an organization that secures material compensation for Holocaust survivors around the world, produced a study in 2020 that examined the knowledge of… [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
Onions were distributed to wholesalers, restaurants, and retail stores in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Attorney General William Barr stated in the Wall Street Journal that the belief that ESG factors are material to profitability “appears to rest more on hope than fact. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
On April 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm by Michael Lowe
  Instead, it is stored online in a “digital wallet” and transactions are recorded in an online ledger referred to as the “blockchain. [read post]
However, narrow tailoring is not confined to strict scrutiny cases, as seen in McCullen v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]