Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am
Finally, On Point weighs in on the Court’s other habeas decision last week, Harrington v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The test for incompetence of counsel is found in the Supreme Court case, Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Justice Ginsburg's concurrence was much more mild: To prevail under the prejudice requirement of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
Today, in this post, I’ll focus on what the Court had to say about habeas law in one of the decisions, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
Then, applying established standards of review for AEDPA and ineffective-assistance claims under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court pointed out that the key case of Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
It all ties together.The standards created by Strickland and §2254(d) are both "highly deferential," id., at 689; Lindh v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm
Ed. 2d 647 (1984), and adopted in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:55 am
Fuller v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
As in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:44 pm
Frye (No. 10-444), and leave Lafler v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:47 am
VI; Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
That the AEDPA (anti terrorism and effective death penalty act) requires federal courts to give state courts great deference in interpreting the law, and that great deference combined with the fact that the supreme court has never held that a failure to give a closing argument is ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 5:10 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:03 am
Doesn’t have anything to do with the cases from last week — or indeed the cases from the last five years — but I was researching the question of whether a metal pole can be a deadly weapon for purposes of a felonious assault last Friday, when I ran across State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims are analyzed under the test announced in Strickland v. [read post]
