Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled in favor of the couple. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled in favor of the couple. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
During the time in question, BMG arranged with the United States Postal Service ("USPS") to gather and discard undeliverable discs, as it was less costly for BMG to produce replacement discs than to pay for the return and restocking of undeliverable discs. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s precedent in Meritor Sav. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:37 am
Lockheed Martin provides information technology services to the United States government. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:29 am
Hewitt, No. 21-984 In Hewitt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Atkinson tendered his resignation letter immediately after his meeting with his supervisor.9 The following day, however, Atkinson sent a letter to his supervisor rescinding his resignation. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Atkinson tendered his resignation letter immediately after his meeting with his supervisor.9 The following day, however, Atkinson sent a letter to his supervisor rescinding his resignation. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
United States Parole Commission, 13 F.3d 1073 (U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 6:37 am
The case is Tanzin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:15 pm
As reported in the Hunton Employment and Labor Law Blog, on March 1, 2016, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) sued employers for the first time for sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:53 am
EEOC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:20 pm
EDNY Judge Weinstein’s much publicized sentencing decision in the securities fraud case, United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:24 am
The first plaintiff, Constanza, seeks to represent a class of fitness managers from any club in the entire United States; these workers give personal training lessons and sell training packages. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
The ALJ ruled that the GPS data was accurate and reliable and that its use did not violate Halpin's privacy rights under the United States Constitution.The Appellate Division's decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
