Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A."
Results 561 - 580
of 687
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court, New York County held that once a contract of sale is made and approved by the Court, any modification of terms constitutes a new contract and must be re-approved by the Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
Here is the text of President Obama's SOTU Address as prepared for delivery: THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary January 27, 2010 Madame Speaker, Vice President Biden, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans: Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:58 pm
” (Canon U.S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 6:28 pm
Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Cellectis (EPLAW) Cour de Cassation: Territorial scope of injunction granted by Community trademark court: SA Chronopost v SAS DHL Express France (EPLAW) Germany World Cup trade mark dispute: 1-0 says the German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) (JIPLP) Germany joins Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement – takes effect on February 13th (Class 99) India Banyan Tree spreading its roots: Karnataka High Court on jurisdiction (Spicy IP)… [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:56 am
Disbarment Documents *Petition to Accept Disbarment Of Scott Rothstein; *Florida Supreme Court's High Profile Order in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; *Disbarment on Consent; *Florida Bar's Affidavit of Costs in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; and *Disbarment Order. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:43 pm
Supreme Court practitioner and SCOTUSblog co-founder Tom Goldstein released a funny YouTube video playing off of the early Apple ads for the iPhone. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:53 pm
Disbarment Documents *Petition to Accept Disbarment Of Scott Rothstein; *Florida Supreme Court's High Profile Order in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; *Disbarment on Consent; *Florida Bar's Affidavit of Costs in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; and *Disbarment Order. [read post]
Supreme Court dismisses final Tobacco II "grant and hold" case: O'Brien v. Camisasca Automotive Mfg.
24 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Both are "Made in the U.S.A. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
Relying on a recent and directly on point case out of the New Jersey Supreme Court, Rowe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:43 pm
The California Supreme Court held its (usually) weekly conference on October 28, 2009. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Osgoode) Changing trends in grant of temporary injunctions in IP cases (Spicy IP) Ireland Irish make IP-friendly amendments to Finance Act (IP finance) Israel Israel Supreme Court allows generic Apropo snack (IP Factor) Does a mark give rights to an opposite word by association? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Osgoode) Changing trends in grant of temporary injunctions in IP cases (Spicy IP) Ireland Irish make IP-friendly amendments to Finance Act (IP finance) Israel Israel Supreme Court allows generic Apropo snack (IP Factor) Does a mark give rights to an opposite word by association? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Osgoode) Changing trends in grant of temporary injunctions in IP cases (Spicy IP) Ireland Irish make IP-friendly amendments to Finance Act (IP finance) Israel Israel Supreme Court allows generic Apropo snack (IP Factor) Does a mark give rights to an opposite word by association? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:38 am
Supreme Court, in a rare move, ordered the judge in the case to give Wong's attorneys more time to prepare. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:08 pm
So, who is the woman well-positioned to become the next Supreme Court Justice? [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:43 pm
Kelly Eugene Tharp and Papa John's U.S.A.,... [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:40 pm
Kelly Eugene Tharp and Papa John's U.S.A., Inc., in a 22-page, 3-2 opinion,... [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm
The court proceeded to analyze two Washington Supreme Court decisions in which the court refused to apply forum selection clauses because they were violative of Washington's public policy: Dix v. [read post]
