Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
If not, the Supreme Court (and a lot of lawyers) may get to party like it’s 1975. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
Sedenquist, supra.The court goes on to explain that [o]ur Supreme Court recently interpreted MCL 750.213 in People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
The Supreme Court understood that because he was arrested for his expression, the fact that it was on a jacket was not relevant. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:12 am
" Regarding the Supreme Court's recent rulings on affirmative action, the Court says: "Grutter never said, or even hinted, that state universities must do what they barely may do. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Instead, the Supreme Court appeared to elevate public welfare to the same status as real property for the purpose of applying the Constitution's Due Process clause. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
At the same time, the Texas Supreme Court became more pro-defense, or at least less pro-plaintiff, according to legal observers. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am
The IPKat is now pleased to host an analysis of the ruling by Kasper Drazewski (BEUC).Here's what Kasper writes:Go forth and reimplement your APIs: the April 5th Supreme Court judgment in Google v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
The law's constitutionality was sustained by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Cote-Whitacre v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:34 am
Bilski represented the Supreme Court's opportunity for leadership in this area. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:29 am
Puryear's post reminds us that by the time mentally ill people commit heinous crimes, we're having the discussion too late. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
The only news coverage that I've found of yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Harbison v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 8:40 am
And it will likely violate the ADA, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the Olmstead decision. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
In this case, as the Court of Appeal observed, evidentiary rules were very loosely applied . . . and few restrictions were observed by either side, or by the trial court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 10:01 am
My involvement in the case has been as a passive observer until recently when the Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth (www.cwcy.org), was asked to file an amicus brief in the case before the Arkansas Supreme Court based on juror misconduct. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:43 am
Here's an easy one for the Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 4:59 am
The Houston Chronicle published a notable column today titled "Let's keep our mentally ill youth out of detention," by former Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O'Neill, Harris County Judge Ed Emmett, Harris County Juvenile Probation Department Executive Director Tom Brooks and Dr. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
The Supreme Court handed down Collins v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:33 am
The High Courts or the Supreme Court may be very effective and few judges of High Court and the Supreme Court can be extraordinary, but, it is not sufficient and there is an urgent need to look at the functioning of various courts in this country. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
People, 177 Colo. 306, 494 P.2d 97, (Colorado Supreme Court 1972). . . . [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
I'm usually not a fan of the California Supreme Court reaching out to depublish an opinion by the Court of Appeal.But here's a good candidate for precisely that.There's a loose horse out in a rural area, so police officers (understandably) investigate. [read post]
