Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 4:24 am
The court did find that plaintiffs couldn’t proceed with a Declaratory Judgment Act claim because it wasn’t a real claim.But more importantly, breach of warranty and consumer protection claims survived. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 8:59 am
Yelp * CA Anti-SLAPP Cases Involving Consumer Reviews as Matters of Public Concern * Dentist Review on Yelp Gets Partial Anti-SLAPP Protection–Wong v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
If you can draft a patent application, you won’t run up against an ornamentality problem. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
In short, as noted by the Court, the consideration is "...whether “Booking.com” is generic turns on whether that term, taken as a whole, signifies to consumers the class of online hotel-reservation services".The Court quickly noted that under evidence, consumers don't perceive the domain as being generic for hotel-reservation services, and as such, the term cannot be generic. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
One of the most well-known examples occurred in Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Gaudio v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:18 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
Bias v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
He’s just making stuff up. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:17 am
Uncommon, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:57 am
Second, the court rejects the consumer protection claim on two different standing grounds: 1) the named plaintiff didn't suffer any cognizable loss. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
Schedule A Defendants Why Online Marketplaces Don’t Do More to Combat the SAD Scheme–Squishmallows v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:56 am
US * Catching Up on a FOSTA Case–ML v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm
How has AMG affected the FTC’s enforcement program, particularly in consumer protection cases. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act: Like the old California regime, the CPPA enables private individuals to act as “private attorney[s] general” in enforcing consumer protection laws. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 10:17 am
Case Citation: Ziencik v. [read post]
