Search for: "Taylor v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2021, 2:07 pm by Donald Dennison
Despite the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States on June 26, 2015, the effects of longstanding discrimination against the gay and lesbian community continue to linger at both the state and federal level. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
T he ECHR has also recognised that art 8 protects against nuisances, such as noise pollution and toxic fumes (López Ostra v Spain (1994) 20 EHRR 277 (ECHR) at [44]–[58]; Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357 (ECHR); Moreno Gómez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 (ECHR); and Arrondelle v United Kingdom (1982) 26 DR 5.) [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am by paperstreet
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm by Bruce Nye
  You can see previous posts on this subject here, here and here.So far, in one citeable case, Taylor v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]