Search for: "Taylor v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — duty of federal prosecutors to prove the interstate-commerce connection of a charge under the Hobbs Act Halo Electronics v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]