Search for: "The Confederate Note Case" Results 561 - 580 of 794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2020, 11:56 am by Scott R. Anderson, Ashley Deeks
The government seized dynamite, high-powered rifles, Nazi and Confederate flags, and a document described as a contract with the former prime minister of Dominica, Patrick John. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Throw in polarization and we have two cases in one category and one in the other. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  The “Griffin’s Case” argument that Section 3 can only be enforced pursuant to a congressionally enacted statute (or, presumably, in a manner the Constitution itself authorizes, e.g., impeachment, or a House of Congress prohibiting an insurrectionist from sitting). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Adam Chan
Per the Court, the Framers called the Constitutional Convention in large part because of the failure of the Articles of Confederation to provide mechanisms for maintaining an adequate military. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Russ Bensing
  The court notes there’s nothing in the record indicating that PRC “was of particular concern or import to Lang,” and similarly concludes in Griffin’s case that “a review of the record. . . shows that defendant did not make a showing of prejudice. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:50 am by James E. Clapp, guest-blogging
He noted that abet historically referred to verbal encouragement rather than physical assistance, so that aiding and abetting actually covered two different types of participation in a crime. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
It is particularly important to restrict the statute to its express terms in this case. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:13 am by NCC Staff
“There is a legitimate case for having a woman on the $20 and we should have that debate. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
I note that the EY report does not break this down specifically for minor injuries. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:29 pm
  That problem of legalization and transposition of human rights obligations--and rights--applied with equal if not greater force in cases of fundamental differences in political ideology. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division noted that pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 70, “[w]here a minor child is residing within this state, either parent may apply to the supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus to have such minor child brought before such court; and on the return thereof, the court, on due consideration, may award ... custody of such child to either parent. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle &… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 He is correct, for example, in noting that the twelve lowest population states are currently split six-six between Democrats and Republicans. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]