Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Gray" Results 561 - 580 of 769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Coogan and Gray v News Group Newspapers, heard 14, 15 and 16 February 2011 (Vos J) [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:44 am by INFORRM
IHC 40/11 Gray & anr v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd IHC 41/11 Coogan & anr v Same IHC 72/11 Same v Same IHC 73/11 Same v Same These concern the “phone hacking” cases of Andy Gray and Steve Coogan and are applications for disclosure against Glenn Mulcaire which were adjourned from 18 January 2011. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 18 January, applications for disclosure were made by Steve Coogan and Andy Gray against Mr Mulcaire. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Editor’s Weblog has a piece about the Inforrm/MST event at Gray’s Inn “Libel Reform: in the public’s interest? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 am by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome the latest in our series of reponses to the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am by Kelly
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
James Leaton Gray (BBC Information Policy and Compliance). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
    The claimant has brought 11 defamation claims he had brought against people he claimed had defamed. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The Gray Action In a related but earlier decision in Gray v Newsgroup Newspapers and Glenn Mulcaire [2010] EWHC 2893, unreported,  Mr Justice Floyd has ordered on 5th October 2010 (by consent) that the Metropolitan Police disclose their evidence to the Claimant  in relation to the activities of Glenn Mulcaire. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Events We draw attention to the Inforrm, Media Standards Trust, Gray’s Inn event on 11 January 2011: “Libel Reform: in the Public’s Interest? [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by SHG
 Civil law often covers conduct that falls in a gray area of arguable legality. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
In the XJA case, in contrast to the recent decisions in JIH v News Group, Donald v Ntuli and Gray v UVW , the anonymity provisions were extended even though the case did not involve blackmail. [read post]