Search for: "The People v. Officer" Results 561 - 580 of 22,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Part of the lawyer's job therefore is to facilitate communications with people outside. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by crush
Judges who have never held elected office — and it hardly seems a mere coincidence that the campaign finance revolution in the Court began with Davis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:22 am
Rivera threw out the hearing officer's findings, holding that the "People's Court" testimony was not, in fact, testimony. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
 That's great to see, and it's also what every advocate should hope for.I've also taken to live-streaming the oral arguments in the background whenever I've got little better to do at the office. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  San Diego Police Sergeant Charles Lara drove into the Motel 6's parking lot and saw people pointing north. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
  The officer said, and the trial court found, that this violated the Vehicle Code. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm by Kristina Araya
In People v Antwine, No. 297287, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence seized from the home, and reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the case. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:03 am
  It would seem that the decision was made by this anonymous source to go elsewhere in hopes of outing the Patent Office. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am by jonathanturley
District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle has ruled that the federal law prohibiting people from possessing firearms inside post offices is unconstitutional. [read post]