Search for: "The People v. Russell"
Results 561 - 580
of 948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in DIRECTV v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Aiello, 93 A.D.2d 864, 461 N.Y.S.2d 370; People v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Aiello, 93 A.D.2d 864, 461 N.Y.S.2d 370; People v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
Burrage v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:19 pm
People v Swinton, supra; People v Atkinson, 7 NY3d 765 [2006]). [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Circuit in Klayman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
In Robinson Township v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Tuesday’s argument in McFadden v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
See Russell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
(See People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
The question for the Court in McFadden v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The County Court is a court of limited jurisdiction and may act only as provided by the New York Constitution or by act of the Legislature within the limitations of the Constitution (see NY Const, art VI, § 11; Judiciary Law § 190; Matter of Russell v Clute, 222 AD2d 980 [3d Dept 1995]; People ex rel. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Omnicare. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
” In Jacobs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Today, SCOTUSblog correspondent Howe used it to take in the entire oral argument in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Alabama adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively on collateral review to people condemned as juveniles to die in prison. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Patel. [read post]