Search for: "The Thames" Results 561 - 580 of 634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 2:54 am by Neil Ford
The most shocking case - revealed by a Freedom of Information request - happened during a joint operation with Thames Valley Police, who were investigating a murder.Crowdsourcing improvements to the Freedom of Information Act - The Guardian - 24.11.12The government has launched an online consultation inviting feedback on the draft code of practice for authorities to follow on the enhanced the right to data under the Freedom of Information Act, which will be brought into force next… [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal rehearsed the now familiar precedents on the approach to be taken when considering a s.202 review decision, up to and including Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 on ‘the benevolent approach’ to be taken in interpreting the review decision.On the issues raised by Wandsworth:i) NJ argued that the question posed by “section 199(1)(a) was whether residence in a particular district was the individual’s own choice”. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during May 2022 Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in May, and those featured in this round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Privy Council Business,  and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal rehearsed the now familiar precedents on the approach to be taken when considering a s.202 review decision, up to and including Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 on ‘the benevolent approach’ to be taken in interpreting the review decision.On the issues raised by Wandsworth:i) NJ argued that the question posed by “section 199(1)(a) was whether residence in a particular district was the individual’s own choice”. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Energy projects in Canada are of enormous public interest, with significant economic, social, and environmental affects. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:34 pm by charonqc
Labour government Home Secretaries spend a great deal of time expressing disappointment with the judiciary – largely because because their department and those for whom they are responsible do not comply with the law. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The ultimate meaning that the court came to was as follows: “The claimant (1) took part with an acquaintance, Farid Reza, in a car race in the streets of Kingston upon Thames, in which they showed off by driving their high-performance cars at speeds of almost 70mph along public roads in an urban area at around 9pm, to see who had the fastest car; (2) did so with three friends in his car; (3) when Mr Reza’s car struck and killed a pedestrian, Hina Shamin, failed to stop but drove… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:46 am by Jordan Furlong
Also intriguing are joint lawyer-client ventures in the UK (such as those by Geldards and Kent County Council and by Berwin Leighton Paisner and Thames Water) whereby in-house and outside counsel are integrated to an unprecedented degree. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm by chief
Importantly, that “something lacking” might be the failure to deal with events after the first decision, even though they (fairly obviously) could not have been dealt with at that time: see Banks v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames [2008] EWCA Civ 1443; [2009] HLR 29. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
Comment This is, in many ways, a revamped version of Lord Neuberger’s statement in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7, that – as put in this judgment: “In examining the reasons for a decision, the court should adopt a benevolent approach. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
(Survivors did remain, however, and in the late 20th Century their descendants gained federal recognition as a tribe and were granted reserves of land along the Thames and Mystic rivers in southeastern Connecticut.) [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by charonqc
It is a Saturday, of course – and I have spent a most amusing afternoon near Chelsea walking ‘on’ The Thames outside Lambeth Palace to wind up the inhabitants thereof. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm by chief
Importantly, that “something lacking” might be the failure to deal with events after the first decision, even though they (fairly obviously) could not have been dealt with at that time: see Banks v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames [2008] EWCA Civ 1443; [2009] HLR 29. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
Styles, Schools and Movements, 2002, Thames & Hudson), and for other work that it is possible to be ‘wowed by the technical virtuosity and eye-popping visual blast’ (Jerry Saltz, art critic). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
Arguably, the effect on claimants of the band of reasonable responses test has been ameliorated by decisions such as Newbound v Thames Water Utilities Ltd relying on s 98(4)(b) to emphasis the test’s practical limits:  The “band of reasonable responses” has been a stock phrase in employment law for over thirty years, but the band is not infinitely wide. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The claimants are the owners of four glass-walled luxury flats in the Neo Bankside development on the South Bank of the Thames, Block C of which is located about 34 metres from the south side of the new Tate Modern (now called the Blavatnik Building) and its spectacular tenth floor viewing gallery. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm by charonqc
I write this, overlooking the Thames at Battersea (I am right on the river). [read post]