Search for: "Thomas v. Smith" Results 561 - 580 of 1,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser argues that Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion this week (joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch) in Byrd v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:08 am by tortsprof
The Supreme Court has further restricted the tort: In Elliott-Thomas v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
SEC) remains hard to predict [Ilya Shapiro, Cato; earlier] In dissent from cert denial: “Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Argue for Rejecting Deference to Agency Interpretation of Agency Regulations” [Eugene Volokh, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere on Garco Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court in in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:46 am by Adam Steinman
Justice Thomas’s majority opinion begins: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 35 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
I myself am more open to campaign contribution limits than he (or his former boss, Justice Thomas) is; I explain my thinking briefly in this article, which shows me to be one of the few people who thinks Buckley v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
Smith, National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Quoting a 2016 ruling, he acknowledged that a law that said “In Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:11 pm by William Ford
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]