Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 561 - 580 of 1,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by CJLF Staff
The opinion is here.Supreme Court GPS Tracking Case Confounds the Press: Tom Goldstein, writing for SCOTUSblog, explains how he thinks the press got Monday's U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
To make matters even more confusing, as Tom Goldstein pointed out at SCOTUSBlog, most of the mainstream media misinterpreted the opinion to say a warrant is required to use GPS tracking on a personal vehicle. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Supreme Court advocate Tom Goldstein, co-founder of SCOTUSblog, is out to correct what he sees as widespread misreading of the Supreme Court’s decision Monday in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Marcia Oddi
Tom Goldstein, founder of SCOTUSblog, has a long entry today on the SCOTUS decision this week in Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
"Jones confounds the press": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm by Ruth Levor
., Alito concurrence, 6.There's no shortage of commentary in the blawgosphere - here are just a few posts: Washington Post: Robert Barnes, Supreme Court Warrants Needed in GPS TrackingSlate: Dahlia Lithwick,  US v Jones Supreme Court Justices Alito and Scalia brawl over technology and privacy SCOTUS Blog: Tom Goldstein, Reactions to Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm by nflatow
 (For readers interested in a more granular analysis, we recommend Tom Goldstein’s post at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm by Ethan Ackerman
Tom Goldstein shares my conclusion that there are effectively two majority opinions in this case. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am by Derek Bambauer
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am by Derek Bambauer
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by Stephanie Ziegler
  At SCOTUSblog, Tom Goldstein explains the ruling this way: I think that the correct way to understand the case is to read it as having two separate majority opinions. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr describes the unanimous ruling as a “setback to animal-rights activists and a victory for the meat industry,” while Tom Goldstein of this blog provides a brief analysis of the opinion. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:14 am by David Oscar Markus
  I also found interesting Tom Goldstein's reaction about how the government didn't really lose as badly as everyone says it did. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by SHG
  Others, who didn't want to think so hard, wrote simply that the Supreme Court held that the use of GPS tracking device requires a warrant, a view that shows why internet pundits can't necessarily be trusted.The best analysis of the varying positions on the court was written by Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSBlog: Here is the upshot. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:20 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Tom Goldstein weighs in with some excellent points about United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by Orin Kerr
UPDATE: Over at SCOTUSblog, Tom Goldstein notes a point that I simply missed on my initial reading of the opinions: Alito’s concurring opinion not only rejects the new trespass theory, but further indicates that the installation and short-term monitoring is fine — it’s only long-term monitoring that Alito would say is regulated by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:46 am by Kevin O'Keefe
It was started in 2003 by Attorney Tom Goldstein, before he had even made a name for himself as an advocate before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
  This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Kiran Bhat
Tom Ramstack of AHN (via GantDaily.com) reports that the Spanish-language media has taken a strong interest in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
  Tom Goldstein discussed the argument in Williams v. [read post]