Search for: "Towns v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 5,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 3:57 pm
  In a brief order in the Indian land rights case of Carcieri v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 4:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
Boomer v Waterman Family Limited Partnership, 155 A. 3d 901 (MD 3/2/2017)Filed under: Rezoning, Uncategorized [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:23 am by Kevin Sheerin
Sherwood v Town of Lancaster In this Article 78 case, the petitioner sought to appeal the Supreme Court ruling that he was ineligible to receive credit for unused vacation and sick leave accrued as of the date of his retirement. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Similarly, the New York State Civil Service Commission’s Rules for employees of the State as an employer provide, in pertinent part, as follows:“If no effective date is specified in a resignation, it shall take effect upon delivery to or filing in the office of the appointing authority. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Similarly, the New York State Civil Service Commission’s Rules for employees of the State as an employer provide, in pertinent part, as follows:“If no effective date is specified in a resignation, it shall take effect upon delivery to or filing in the office of the appointing authority. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
” As the Court of Appeals said in Chittenden v Wurster, 152 NY 345, the civil divisions of the State are its counties and its towns and its villages. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]