Search for: "U. S. Patent Office"
Results 561 - 580
of 705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
It's good to know that you're fighting the good fight! [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:43 am
When the Court of Claims merged with the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to form the U. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
S. universities and that people from all around the world wanted to study in the U. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:58 am
S. universities and that people from all around the world wanted to study in the U. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:04 pm
There’s that business of the prosecutor and the AWOL iPhone 4 prototype, and of course a Texas jury earlier this month found that Apple violated several patents central to some of the Mac’s niftier features. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a notice of allowance for one of the patent applications, the ‘158 Patent Application, on January 11, 2021. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Holding the “responsible corporate officer” responsible: addressing the need for expansion of criminal liability for corporate environmental violators. 3 Golden Gate U. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
The dissent does not consider itself bound by Cuozzo's conclusion that §314(d) bars appeal of "questions that are closely tied to the application and interpretation of statutes related to the Patent Office's decision to initiate inter partes review," 579 U. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
Mendez, 16-369, involves that court’s exception to the “excessive force standard” the Supreme Court articulated for law-enforcement officers in Graham v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:12 am
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:06 am
It's actually nuts. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
(quoting 21 U. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Nielson, The Minor Questions Doctrine, 169 U. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
B. 1763), the same judge who is recorded in Wilkes gave an opinion upholding a jury's award of £300 (against a government officer again) although "if the jury had been confined by their oath to consider the mere personal injury only, perhaps [£20] damages would have been thought damages sufficient. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:25 am
Associated Press, 50 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
It’s actually pronounced “F-U-C-T” clearly reads differently, which is why the application filed by Brunetti to register the term as a trademark in connection with various types of clothing and accessories was initially rejected by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (who deemed it “totally vulgar”) and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) (who declared the mark to be “highly offensive, vulgar,” and… [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
Under HemCon’s rule, such a requestor could expect that, even if the reexamination ultimately confirms all claims as patentable without amendment, the patent owner will necessarily make substantive arguments in defending the claims, thereby allowing the requestor to allege intervening rights based on those arguments. [read post]
