Search for: "U. S. v. Branch"
Results 561 - 580
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 1:33 pm
Both of the Kiyemba cases are sequels to the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 10:35 pm
In the second, Lane v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
It's about time the Executive Branch got serious about indigent defense. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
Defending and indemnifying an employee being sued for damages for acts or omissions that occurred in the performance of official dutiesLarson v County of Seneca, 2009 NY Slip Op 50177(U), Decided on February 5, 2009, Supreme Court, Ontario County, Supreme Court Justice Craig J. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:06 pm
” Thus, it concluded, neither the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Doctors perform best when fully informed about the patient’s history and information. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
" WRTL, 551 U. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:32 pm
S. ___ (2008) (slip op., at 36) (quoting Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:19 pm
European Union - EU - European Commission - Information Society: "Legal and Administrative Practices Regarding the Validity and Mutual Recognition of e-Documents - 17 December 2006 The study clarifies the present situation concerning the national legal and administrative practices in 32 countries (the 25 Member States, 3 EFTA countries parties to the EEA Agreement (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway), 2 Acceding Countries (Bulgaria and Romania) and 2 Candidate Countries (Croatia and Turkey); it… [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:46 pm
United States, 543 U. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
Contrary to Vinar's contention, the Lazer defendants are entitled to seek contribution or indemnification from him, as a subsequently retained attorney, to the extent his alleged negligence in settling the plaintiff's arbitration claims may have contributed to or aggravated her injuries (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 3-6; Alfaro v Schwartz, 233 AD2d 281, 281-282; Herkrath v Gaffin & Mayo, 192 AD2d 487, 488). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
In Pascarella v Goldberg, Cohn & Richter, LLP ; 2009 NY Slip Op 52193(U) ;Decided on October 23, 2009 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Hinds-Radix, J. we see how the court works its way through plaintiff's claims. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
DeKalb County, 433 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
Geren controls that issue, much more than the Court’s more sweeping decision the same day on detainees’ rights, Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
Fortunately, there are gifted professionals in the remaining branches of government possessed of the experience and wisdom to address these issues. [read post]
