Search for: "U. S. v. Certain"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 4:10 am
In Englese v Sladkus 2018 NY Slip Op 50621(U) Decided on April 25, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County, Judge St. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Sunbeam asked Pentalpha, owned by Global-Tech Appliances, "to supply Sunbeam with deep fryers meeting certain specifications. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 10:39 pm
S. 198, 202 (2006); Zipes v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:46 am
Like last term’s decision of City of Ontario v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Professions v State of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 50084(U), Supreme Court, Albany County A faculty member in the collective bargaining unit represented by United University Professions (UUP) employed by a unit of the State University of New York [SUNY] was suspended without pay pending the resolution of certain charges of misconduct filed against him. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In the 1973 case of Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:32 pm
S. 483 (1886), and Morrison v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:17 am
Moldovan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Judge Spath then turned to a filing by al-Darbi’s counsel claiming broad psychotherapist-client privilege under Military Commission Rule of Evidence (M.C.R.E.) 513 for certain records sought by al-Nashiri’s defense team. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued a ruling on the status of equity partners in law firms that flies in the face a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada.On May 22, the SCC ruled in McCormick v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
See Casey, 505 U. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:56 am
The court’s ruling in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm
Twombly's record Counting today's ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
” 15 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:40 pm
U. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am
Robinson v Day 2019 NY Slip Op 30153(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600907/2010 Judge: O. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am
[U]nlike typical restrictive covenants, upon which a prospective employee's position may depend, there were no consequences attached to [the employee]'s refusal to accept the agreement. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 5:49 pm
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]