Search for: "U. S. v. King" Results 561 - 580 of 584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Defendant: Styles 4 U, Hyuk Chung, Does Case Number: 2:2008cv01485 Genis Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 10:20 pm
The Second Department's decision in Deborah Int’l Beauty Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:53 am
The University of Chicago Law Review, Issue 74:4 (Fall 2007) Articles David S. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
Kelly Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYWorkers' Compensation Employee Not Acting in Furtherance of 'Alter Ego' Employer's Purpose; WCL Not Bar to Recovery Anduaga v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm by Damin J. Toell, Esq.
Since it seems that the patient actually appeared for the EUO, it's a much tougher call to make than the more often litigated situation of an EUO no-show where non-compliance vitiates coverage.Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v MVAIC, 2007 NY Slip Op 52143(U) (Civ. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:09 am
Here is an interesting but tragic case currently in trial in King County, Washington. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Fulton Interest LLC Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYJudges Judge Recuses Himself From Case Due to Senator's Of Counsel Status at One Party's Firm Frankel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
KINGS COUNTYAdministrative LawCommission's Determination Denying Petitioner's Application for Trade Waste Removal License Upheld DeCostello Carting Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:06 am
Today the Washington Supreme Court hears arguments in King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
And yet, this fact is blithely ignored by the DC Circuit panel: [U]nder the common law [habeas corpus], the dispositive fact was not a petiotioner's alien enemy status, but his lack of presence within any sovereign territory. [read post]