Search for: "U. S. v. Price" Results 561 - 580 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
As stock prices reflect profits potentially years in the future, even long-term climate-related risks can affect profit [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
  PURCHASE PRICE The purchase price of the shares of the common stock of McCall’s shall be determined by calculating the arithmetic average of the Net Income of McCall’s for the five (5) fiscal years immediately preceding the date of death of a stockholder or the date The Selling Stockholder gives notice of the intention to sell all of his or her shares of stock to McCall’s, and multiplying the quotient thereby obtained by four (4).… [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:27 pm
In fact, the issue was of such concern that baseball’s Safety and Health Advisory Committee was convened to study the problem and issue recommendations, including, if deemed appropriate, banning the use of maple bats. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
  Based upon William Vickrey’s idea that traffic jams occur when drivers are not charged for the full costs they impose upon others the theory dates back to 1952. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The owners of the deposits did not seek to exploit the deposits for years, but when the price of uranium spiked during the mid-2000s, they sued to challenge the commonwealth’s mining moratorium. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:34 am by Susan Brenner
The opinion also points out that [u]nder questioning from his own counsel, . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am by Susan Brenner
The court therefore held that [u]nder the facts of this case, we conclude that the benefits of deterrence do not outweigh the co [read post]