Search for: "U.S. Bank, N.A" Results 561 - 580 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
HBSC Bank Nevada, N.A., 557 F.3d 1026 (2009), will probably be impacted as well. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:10 am
[O]n August 23, 2007, a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena was prepared and served on Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A., the financial institution responsible for issuing the check/debit card (# xxxx74013491xxxx) [redacted] to checking account number xxx-xxxxxxx. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:19 pm
As of April 28, the Making Home Affordable website listed the following servicers as having executed HAMP contracts: Bank of America, N.A.; Chase Financial LLC; CitiMortgage, Inc.; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP; GMAC Mortgage LLC; Home Loan Services, Inc.; Ocwen Financial Corporation, Inc.; Saxon Mortgage Services; Select Portfolio Servicing; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and Wilshire Credit Corporation. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 1:14 am
Colonial is a bank holding company that operates Colonial Bank, N.A., which has 347 bank branches in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Nevada and Texas, and over $26 billion in assets. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
SCOTUSblog  Originally started by Tom Goldstein – now a partner with Akin Gump – SCOTUSblog is the leading resource on the web for breaking news on the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:22 am
Which is why I am linking to Economic presence meets taxing requirement from The Indiana Lawyer:In a matter of first impression, the Indiana Tax Court has ruled that a bank didn't need to have a physical presence in the state to be subject to Indiana's Financial Institutions Tax.In MBNA America Bank, N.A. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
The court pointed out that the case Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:23 pm
State of Connecticut, No. 644149 "Grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-bank is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) plaintiff lacked standing to challenge section 42-480 of the state statute; 2) the district court's preemption ruling was erroneous because section 42-480 did not apply to national banks; and 3) the National Bank Act should not be construed to preempt that statute because that statute regulates only non-bank entities. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Warnick, 476 N.E.2d 109, 114 (Ind. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920, (1985)). [read post]