Search for: "US v. Andrew Grant"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2017, 3:32 pm
The case is Kristen Kjaer Weis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
The article outlines the case as it progresses in order to reassure anyone worried about the aftermath of the Depp v Heard decision in the US. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
Estate of Berry v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Finally, we answered the question that set us out on this journey: Did the Supreme Court grant more cert petitions brought by defendants? [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
Alitowski at 888-ASK-ANDREW (275-2637) or contact us online. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
LBSF’s arguments were rejected by Sir Andrew Morritt VC at first instance; and then by a unanimous Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger; Longmore and Patten LJJ), when the case was co-listed with Butters & Ors v BBC Worldwide, in which this firm were successful on behalf of BBC Worldwide (see here for a summary of the facts in Butters). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:50 pm
King-Morrow v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:49 am
(NFP) Jack Andrew Watterson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:19 pm
The requested fee is 6 times larger than the current record in the Delaware Court of Chancery set by the $304,742,604.45 granted to plaintiffs in Americas Mining Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:28 pm
Smith highlighted a recent favorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:17 am
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Holder, in which the Court struck down the coverage formula used to determine which jurisdictions must comply with the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act, and Fisher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
In one of a series of rulings in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:06 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
Cameron v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Cadena v. [read post]
