Search for: "US v. Battle"
Results 561 - 580
of 8,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
The opinion of Gorsuch J for the US Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) has been widely welcomed on the US political right as a victory religious rights and just as broadly deplored on the US political left as a defeat for LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
Case citation: Goldline, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
One such case is the matter of Abbott v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak explains that Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
Judge Hacon quickly dismissed UOGB’s arguments to the contrary, and saw that the mark was descriptive for both concert services and CDs and DVDs.He then turned to considerations under Article 7(d), and denied UOGB's its application in the case due to the mark’s clear lack of use in the trade of ukulele orchestras, thus potentially monopolizing the terms use in the area. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
The real battle ground was validity. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:35 pm
Motionless Keyboard v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Council v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
Since then, the battle has been waged over various forms of user-generated content platforms and search tools. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” But the legal battle is far from over. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The post DYKES ON BIKES No Longer Idling After Matal v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 4:06 am
SEC v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 1:42 pm
Merck & Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:11 pm
A battle of batting helmets: Rawlings’ helmet (left), which Rawlingsalleges Under Armour used (right) with Under Armour’s logo On Oct. 27, Western District Judge Marsha Pechman granted Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
This fight may be over, but the battle continues until every content owner embraces best practices that protect fair use." [read post]
