Search for: "US v. Hart" Results 561 - 580 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She decries prosecutors use of tactical maneuverings to avoid so-called "Brady" disclosures (after the US Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:27 am by Meg Martin
Ruppert of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, WY.Representing Amicus Curiae Northern Cheyenne Tribe: John C. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by William Baude, guest-blogging
Henry Hart called this kind of federal law “interstitial. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:34 am by Rosalind English
Here are a few examples picked entirely at random: the right of a detainee to have access to legal advice is a fundamental safeguard against ill-treatment (Salduz v Turkey ) in the Convention system, the prohibition against the use of evidence obtained by torture is fundamental ….Few international norms relating to the right to a trial are more fundamental than the exclusion of evidence obtained by torture. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Kashamu is a modern approach that applies the principles of contract law to choice of court agreements. [1]For an extended analysis see generally CSA Okoli and RF Oppong, Private International Law in Nigeria (Hart, 2020) 107 – 125. [2]Nika Fishing Company Ltd v Lavina Corporation (2008 ) 16 NWLR 509, 542 (Tobi JSC); Captain Tony Nso v Seacor Marine ( Bahamas) Inc ( 2008 ) LPELR-8320 (CA); Beaumont Resources Ltd v DWC Drilling Ltd ( 2017 ) LPELR-42814 (CA);… [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:34 pm by Joy Waltemath
The court also held that the issue of damages associated with the improper tip-out policy could proceed to trial on a classwide basis (Hart v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:56 am
The comments on "bad exams" have been fascinating and useful. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
In this case the Court seems to have taken a less stringent approach than it did in previous cases such as Cooke & Midland Hart v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), in which it was held that serious harm could only be inferred in the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
 August 5, 2011David Hart QC Do we need a UK Bill of Rights? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]