Search for: "US v. Potter" Results 561 - 580 of 642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 3:38 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
As Justice Potter Stewart said in the famous Supreme Court opinion, Jacobellis v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:10 pm
  So, for example, if I review the new Harry Potter movie, I can use the trademark "Harry Potter" in my review without fear of liability because it is both descriptive of the source of the film (the Harry Potter franchise co-owned by Warner Brothers and J.K. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
To make their point, the defense lawyers led their brief with a citation that might've been styled Potter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
  No articles suggested that raw milk should be used as a probiotic. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:03 am
Potter (06-1321), decided 6-3. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:40 pm
NEW YORK — The decision in the Harry Potter case might well still be a few weeks coming, but in the meantime we’ve got another cool copyright case to keep us busy. [read post]