Search for: "US v. Powell" Results 561 - 580 of 1,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2016, 7:32 am by Alex R. McQuade
Jefferson Powell on his new book Targeting Americans: The Constitutionality of the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
All parties favoured the exploration of other solutions in addition to patent law.

 Amandine Métier (Véron & Associés), Thomas Misgaiski (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER) and Vittorio Cerulli Irelli (Trevisan Cuonzo) had the pleasure of being joined by Judge Peter Blok of the Court of Appeal in The Hague to explore the CJEU's ruling on Huawei v ZTE, the national aftermath and the Judge's perspective. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v City of Powell, 2016 WL 1165355 (SD OH 3/25/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
Gleason to use his authority as Town Assessor to intimidate Plaintiff. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
High court should step in against law regulating speech regarding ballot measures by small, low-budget groups [John Kramer, Institute for Justice on Justice v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Anyway John tells me he usually uses some theme relating to the news or time of year. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2016).From SSRN (Non-U.S Law):Christa Rautenbach, The South African Constitutional Court's Use of Foreign Precedent in Matters of Religion: Without Fear or Favour? [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
His passion and enthusiasm for his subject caused him to, so to speak, “lose the run of himself” [20] The Handyside freedom of expression test, as applied by Lord Bingham in Director of Public Prosecution v Collins [2006], was whether the defendant, in exercising his right to say things or express opinions which offended, shocked or disturbed one or more sectors of the population, use language which was “BEYOND THE PALE” of what was intolerable in… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Powell, 94 Fla. 550, 556, 114 So. 375, 378 (1927) (holding that, where a contract for legal services fails to expressly provide for the amount of the fee, a “reasonable” fee is implied); McGill v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:42 am by John Jascob
The CFTC did not show that the district court had abused its discretion in declining to order restitution (CFTC v. [read post]