Search for: "United States of America v. Shorts" Results 561 - 580 of 1,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  He writes, echoing Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
  -->  COURSE SHORT DESCRIPTION: This course provides an introduction to the law and policy of corporate social responsibility (CSR). [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Halliburton, 667 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2012): In a very well reasoned Defense Base Act (“DBA”) decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the DBA is an employee’s exclusive remedy for injuries sustained during employment. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
In short, a defendant cannot have just a “plausible” belief in non-infringement, there must be a good faith state-of-mind that supports the belief. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
"Last month, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
” “FDR did not hesitate long over a 1937 Supreme Court opinion (United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
But because such states are unlikely to pay, Congress passed the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (the “Act”), which established a fund to compensate terrorism victims. [read post]