Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 561 - 580 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
By Jessica Gladney In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Stitt and the State of Oklahoma (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:38 am by Larry
On the other hand, as the record is made by the United States government and must be filed with the Court, it seems there should be a logical (though not legal) assumption that it reflects the facts as CBP found them. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
The “next” US Supreme Court term has already started; although the Court traditionally begins its term on the first Monday in October, this month had oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Jim Shore
In a significant win for employers, the United States Supreme Court has issued a landmark decision upholding the use of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Jim Shore
In a significant win for employers, the United States Supreme Court has issued a landmark decision upholding the use of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm by Georgialee Lang
The United States Supreme Court has examined the laws on sex offender registries in two cases. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Eluding the proper scope of federal jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 11:43 am
State, 2008 WL 612807 (Alaska Court of Appeals 2008). [read post]