Search for: "United States v. Alaska" Results 561 - 580 of 1,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 1:01 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Aubrey (Indian Tribal Organization - Misused Property)United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlKizer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlNew Mexico v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm by Joe Koncelik
The 13 states covered under the Court’s injunction are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 2:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Stranburg (Casinos, Rental Tax) United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlFlathead Irrigation District v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Police Pursuit in Indian Country, Dispute over Evidence, Jurisdiction)Northern Arapaho Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
 Judge Kozinski instead articulates hyperbolic, Scalia-like claims, including an allegation that the United States has become "more an oligarchy governed by a cadre of black-robed mandarins" and his alleged "worry about the future of the Republic" from cases like this one.All of this in a dissent that's a single paragraph.My view is that the overwrought claims here do a disservice to their authors and to the judiciary as well. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]