Search for: "United States v. Ali" Results 561 - 580 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
The last time we covered the progress of the case that I’ll call Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm by Robert Chesney
  In this respect, the case will be akin to Abu Ali v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am by John Bellinger
While everyone has been focused on Libya war powers over the last few days, the DC Circuit issued an interesting opinion on Tuesday in an Alien Tort Statute suit (Ali Shafi v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The appellant’s brief in the case al-Zahrani et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s a link to an AP article on the Army Times‘ website analyzing yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, 174 U. [read post]
29 May 2011, 4:21 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  By far the more significant of the two is United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:53 pm by Calvin Massey
The Supreme Court today upheld an Arizona law that revoked the business licenses of businesses that knowingly hire a person unlawfully present in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:39 am by Dwight Sullivan
  The argument is scheduled for 1000 in front of Judges Tozzi, Sims, and Gallagher in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:12 am by Dwight Sullivan
On Thursday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]