Search for: "United States v. Blank" Results 561 - 580 of 700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
(Federal public defenders apparently already are paid on par with Assistant United States Attorneys.) [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
United States, 488 U.S. 361, 413 (1989). [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
 The United States is far from a truly  free nation; nor are any other nations. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
Section 861 states that certain `items of gross income shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.... [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
 Last June, the United States Supreme Court determined that blank">Crawford v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
  Global - Patents Open Innovation Network unveils Linux Defenders to protect open source from patent suits by establishing prior art and participating in patent peer review (Ars Technica) (Securing Innovation)   Bulgaria RARBG, ArenaBG and other BitTorrent trackers forced to shut down or relocate following police action (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak)   Cameroon Third-level domain names come to Cameroon (Afro-IP)     Canada   Copyright Board… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
    United States Constitution (From blank">public domain.) [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
 Sometimes the  United States Supreme Court does true justice for criminal defendants. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]