Search for: "United States v. Booker"
Results 561 - 580
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
That section is inapplicable here because there is not a United States citizen on each side of the dispute. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:43 pm
Rich Kopf United States District Judge [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 06-6330 (per Booker, crack guidelines are advisory only; judge may consider crack/powder disparity in sentencing below the guidelines).United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 1:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 5:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
He raises four challenges to his convictions and sentence: that his trial violated the Speedy Trial Act, that his firearm possession convictions are multiplicitous, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that his term of supervised release was imposed in violation of United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
" See United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
State, 769 So. 2d at 986 .................................................................................................................7 Booker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
There is an ironic symmetry to United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
