Search for: "United States v. City of Chicago" Results 561 - 580 of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
In Syria, the United States once again launched air strikes against the Khorasan group, a faction of the al Nusra Front, on Wednesday night. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:44 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
Based in Oakbrook Terrace and downtown Chicago, our Gurnee and Des Plaines non-compete clause and business dispute lawyers take cases from Naperville, Lake Forest and Northbrook and many other cities throughout Illinois, as well as in Indiana, Wisconsin and the entire United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
City of Chicago, 382 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2004); Frank v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Briggs and City of Chicago v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
  American cities, such as Washington, DC, Chicago, and New York, are installing similar video surveillance systems in their streets, parks and public transportation systems. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
John's United Church of Christ v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
City of Chicago. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 11:34 am
He referred to the United States' jury-trial right, one that the Court, reversing precedent, held to be fundamental in Duncan v. [read post]